From 0f5bddb14313dd4b46e5d6eb2b2081bf08945836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Harrington Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 07:39:16 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] phrasing --- ScopeSequencing.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ScopeSequencing.tex b/ScopeSequencing.tex index c12e6a8..d734b61 100644 --- a/ScopeSequencing.tex +++ b/ScopeSequencing.tex @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ When members have a shareholder model then there needs to be a cash-out process. When an organization is transitioned from one generation to the next as ownership, there is a problem where the inheritors may not be interested in participation, and so would need to exit the organization. Members exiting without a desire to maintain stability can cause destabilization. -\subsection{Why are commons durable?} +\subsection{How can commons be made durable?} Commons, if designed well, and governed well, could be a much more stable structure. In the first generation, both a commons and a cooperatively owned business have similar benefits and stability to the members. The generational turnover is very different. A commons will use the decision making process established to accept new members when a previous member leaves or passes away. Allowing the commons to decide who to include in future operation stabilizes the organization.