How_to_Build_a_Commons/HowToBuildACommonsWorkbooks
2
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/How-To-Build-a-Commons/HowToBuildACommonsWorkbooks.git synced 2026-04-19 16:51:04 +00:00
Code Issues Projects 1 Releases Packages Activity

Merge pull request #16 from How-To-Build-a-Commons/v/latexify

Browse source 
minor change to the footnote
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Harrington 2025-10-14 10:21:12 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 60be07a2e7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
ScopeSequencing.tex
View file

@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ No one should be forced to go along with a decision to which they did not assent
\item the facilitator checks for consensus by:
\begin{enumerate}
\item asking if there are any stand-asides. By standing aside one is saying “I don’t like this idea, and wouldn’t take part in the action, but I’m not willing to stop others from doing so”. It is always important to allow all those who stand aside to have a chance to explain why they are doing so.
\item asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group.{42},
Footnote {42} I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”.
\item asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group\footnote{I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”.}.,
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}