From 6c19a548b1792ffe9c1de270cf0ca6ef1a2c864c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Harrington Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:38:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] formatting --- ScopeSequencing.tex | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ScopeSequencing.tex b/ScopeSequencing.tex index c3e5bc5..bd4f62c 100644 --- a/ScopeSequencing.tex +++ b/ScopeSequencing.tex @@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ No one should be forced to go along with a decision to which they did not assent \vspace{0.2cm} -The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below. - +The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below. + +{\setlength{\parindent}{0pt} + \textbf{1)} someone makes a proposal for a certain course of action \vspace{0.2cm} @@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below. \textbf{4.2)} asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group. I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”. \par} - +\par} \pagebreak {\centering \huge \textbf{Why Build a Common?}\par}