adding some content

ScopeSequencing.tex

@@ -166,10 +166,24 @@ By durable we mean an organization that is intended to have stability long after
 
 \subsection{How does an organization have durability?}
 
+When organizers create a structure that adds the design features of a stable commons. We can see a breakdown of these design principals in section 2. 
+
+When decisions are made through a consensus process. We can see a breakdown of the consensus process in section 4.
+
+When members have trust and mutual aid with each other. We can see a process for boot-strapping trust in section 6.  
+
 \subsection{How does an organization lack durability?}
 
+When members have a shareholder model then there needs to be a cash-out process. Cash-outs can destabilize an organization.
+
+When an organization is transitioned from one generation to the next as ownership, there is a problem where the inheritors may not be interested in participation, and so would need to exit the organization. Members exiting without a desire to maintain stability can cause destabilization. 
+
 \subsection{Why are commons durable?}
 
+Commons, if designed well, and governed well, could be a much more stable structure. In the first generation, both a commons and a cooperatively owned business have similar benefits and stability to the members. The generational turnover is very different. A commons will use the decision making process established to accept new members when a previous member leaves or passes away. Allowing the commons to decide who to include in future operation stabilizes the organization. 
+
+
+
 
 \pagebreak