diff --git a/ScopeSequencing.tex b/ScopeSequencing.tex
index 49bb95a..48806da 100644
--- a/ScopeSequencing.tex
+++ b/ScopeSequencing.tex
@@ -75,44 +75,44 @@
 \end{multicols}
 
 \pagebreak
-{\huge \textbf{What is a Common?}}
+\section{What is a Common}
 
 \textbf{Governing the Commons by Ellinor Ostrum Table 3.1}
 
 
 Design principles illustrated by long-enduring CPR institutions
 
-\textbf{1. Clearly defined boundaries}
+\subsection{Clearly defined boundaries}
 
 Individuals or households who have rights to withdraw resource units from the CPR must be clearly defined, as must the boundaries of the CPR itself.
 
-\textbf{2. Congruence between appropriation and provision rules and local conditions}
+\subsection{ Congruence between appropriation and provision rules and local conditions}
 
  Appropriation rules restricting time, place, technology, and/or quantity of resource units are related to local conditions and to provision rules requiring labor, material, and/or money.
 
-\textbf{3. Collective-choice arrangements}
+\subsection{Collective-choice arrangements}
 
 Most individuals affected by the operational rules can participate in modifying the operational rules.
 
-\textbf{4. Monitoring}
+\subsection{Monitoring}
 
 Monitors, who actively audit CPR conditions and appropriator behavior, are accountable to the appropriators or are the appropriators.
 
-\textbf{5. Graduated sanctions}
+\subsection{Graduated sanctions}
 
 Appropriators who violate operational rules are likely to be assessed graduated sanctions (depending on the seriousness and context of the offense) by other appropriators, by officials accountable to these appropriators, or by both.
 
-\textbf{6. Conflict-resolution mechanisms}
+\subsection{Conflict-resolution mechanisms}
 
 Appropriators and their officials have rapid access to low-cost local arenas to resolve conflicts among appropriators or between appropriators and officials.
 
-\textbf{7. Minimal recognition of rights to organize}
+\subsection{Minimal recognition of rights to organize}
 
 The rights of appropriators to devise their own institutions are not challenged by external governmental authorities.
 
 For CPRs that are parts of larger systems:
 
-\textbf{8. Nested enterprises}
+\subsection{Nested enterprises}
 
 Appropriation, provision, monitoring, enforcement, conflict resolution, and governance activities are organized in multiple layers of nested enterprises.
 
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Appropriation, provision, monitoring, enforcement, conflict resolution, and gove
 
 
 \pagebreak
-{\huge \textbf{What is Consensus Process?}}
+\section{What is Consensus Process?}
 
 Consensus is a process where everyone should be able to weigh in equally on a decision, and no one should be bound by a decision they detest."
 this boils doing in practice to: Everyone who feels they have something relevant to say about a proposal ought to have their perspectives carefully considered.
@@ -152,24 +152,22 @@ No one should be forced to go along with a decision to which they did not assent
 Footnote {42} I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”.
 
 \pagebreak
-{\huge \textbf{Why Build a Common?}}
+\section{Why Build a Common?}
 
 From the Yana Ludwig reading:
 
-\begin{enumerate}
-	\item Spiritual or Religious
-	\item 	Cultural Preservation
-	\item 	Social Experimentation
-	\item 	Service-based
-	\item 	Economic Security
-	\item 	Identity-based Safe Havens
-	\item 	Lifestyle and Comfort Enhancement
-	\item 	Ecological Sustainability
-\end{enumerate}
+\subsection{Spiritual or Religious}
+\subsection{Cultural Preservation}
+\subsection{Social Experimentation}
+\subsection{Service-based}
+\subsection{Economic Security}
+\subsection{Identity-based Safe Havens}
+\subsection{Lifestyle and Comfort Enhancement}
+\subsection{Ecological Sustainability}
 
 
 \pagebreak
-{\huge \textbf{What we Owe to Each Other}}
+\section{What we Owe to Each Other}
 
 
 "In a typical village, the only people likely to pay cash were passing
@@ -194,8 +192,7 @@ A modern version of the village exchange loops would be the idea of Maker Checks
 
 
 \pagebreak
-{\huge \textbf{What is Property?}}
-{\fontsize{9pt}{9pt}\selectfont
+\section{What is Property?}
 \large Legal Definitions:
 
 This category is referred to as "Private Property" and is a collection of a few distinct rights. These are the rights enforced by and recognized by law. 
@@ -212,20 +209,19 @@ This category is referred to as "Private Property" and is a collection of a few
 \end{enumerate}
 	
 
-\large \textbf{Categories in a Commons}
+\subsection{Categories in a Commons}
 
 Within a Commons, once the external entity has been assigned Private Property rights within the law, then that "bubble" can ascribe the rights according to its own rules. The commons can allocate areas of the pieces of the physical world that it manages (the clearly defined boundaries). The allocations can be for consumed aspects (the increase), it can be to assign use terms (Usufruct), and it can determine to what degree exclusion and destruction are used within the commons.
 
-\large \textbf{Personal Property}: The items or space that is exclusively assigned along the legal definition. These can be either private property that came with someone into the commons, or can be the appropriators allocated share of some bounty. 
+\subsection{Personal Property}: The items or space that is exclusively assigned along the legal definition. These can be either private property that came with someone into the commons, or can be the appropriators allocated share of some bounty. 
 
- \large \textbf{Commons Space}: This is the piece of the physical world that may have Usufruct allocated to members, or the public. These generally have the right of destruction held withing the commons (for repairs and upgrades). The right to exclude is also held by the commons itself to determine if and when people can or will be excluded. 
+\subsection{Commons Space}: This is the piece of the physical world that may have Usufruct allocated to members, or the public. These generally have the right of destruction held withing the commons (for repairs and upgrades). The right to exclude is also held by the commons itself to determine if and when people can or will be excluded. 
  
-  \large \textbf{Public Space}: This is space held by the state that assigned property rights. Examples would be the roads, infrastructure and public lands such as parks. 
-}
+\subsection{Public Space}: This is space held by the state that assigned property rights. Examples would be the roads, infrastructure and public lands such as parks. 
 
 \pagebreak
 
-\huge \textbf{HOWTO Build Common Workshop}
+\huge \textbf{HOW-TO Build Common Workshop}
 
 \linedpage
 
@@ -253,7 +249,7 @@ Workshop 4
 
 \pagebreak
 
-\huge \textbf{A Call To Action}
+\section{A Call To Action}
 
 {\fontsize{11pt}{11pt}\selectfont
 I don't want to run a business. I don't want to manage or profit from