From e487672e894ad2e06d3e79ee5ff8b24bd415eecc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Harrington Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 11:04:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Adding foootnotes --- ScopeSequencing.tex | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/ScopeSequencing.tex b/ScopeSequencing.tex index 4d1790b..2ed3e8a 100644 --- a/ScopeSequencing.tex +++ b/ScopeSequencing.tex @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ A commons is some piece of the physical world that is managed by a community for A commons can be managed in a very large variety of ways. Members create the rules that are used to govern their own commons. Some commons are more and less stable over time, depending on what rules the community chooses to adopt. -Lets review some design principals used by commons across the world for stable commons. These principals were derived by Ostrum from a datasets of commons that have been operating for at least 200 years. +Lets review some design principals used by people across the world for stable commons. These principals were derived by Ostrum from a datasets of commons' that have been operating for at least 200 years. " \begin{enumerate} @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ For commons that are parts of larger systems: Appropriation, provision, monitoring, enforcement, conflict resolution, and governance activities are organized in multiple layers of nested enterprises. -"\footnote{"Ostrum p90"} +"\footnote{"Governing the Commons p90"} \end{enumerate} \vspace{0.2cm} @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Always remember that building a common is a step-by-step process. You will start Consensus is a process where everyone should be able to weigh in equally on a decision, and no one should be bound by a decision they detest. This boils doing in practice to: Everyone who feels they have (something relevant to the commons) to say about a proposal ought to have their perspectives carefully considered. When making decision for the commons, every member should have the right to participate equally. -Everyone who has strong concerns or objections should have those concerns or objections taken into account and, (if allowed by the commons structure), addressed in the final form of the proposal. +"Everyone who has strong concerns or objections should have those concerns or objections taken into account and, (if allowed by the commons structure), addressed in the final form of the proposal. Anyone who feels a proposal violates a fundamental principle shared by the group should have the opportunity to veto (“block”) that proposal. @@ -232,10 +232,11 @@ A consensus meeting needs some structure to function. When running a meeting the \begin{enumerate} \item asking if there are any stand-asides. By standing aside one is saying “I don’t like this idea, and wouldn’t take part in the action, but I’m not willing to stop others from doing so”. It is always important to allow all those who stand aside to have a chance to explain why they are doing so. - \item asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group\footnote{I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”.}., + \item asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group. Note: I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”., \end{enumerate} \end{enumerate} +" \footnote{Democracy Project - Chapter 2 } \pagebreak @@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ Within a Commons, once the external entity has been assigned Private Property ri or year or so, communities would hold a general public " reckoning," cancelling debts out against each other in a great circle, with only those differences then remaining when all was done being settled by use of - coin or goods." (Debt: The First 5000 Years Page 327) + coin or goods." \footnotemark \vspace{0.2cm} @@ -373,6 +374,7 @@ Within a Commons, once the external entity has been assigned Private Property ri \vspace{0.1cm} {\footnotesize Cut along the dotted line} \end{minipage} +\footnotetext{Debt: The First 5000 Years Page 327} %End of the check @@ -454,9 +456,7 @@ design a better world, a world of local sustainable automated abundance - to do away with greed, with hate and domination. Let us design for a world of reason, a world where science and progress will lead to all humanity's freedom. \textbf{Makers!} in the name of Freedom and -Community, \textbf{let us all unite!} - -(Credit: Charlie Chaplin, Reworked by Kevin Harrington) +Community, \textbf{let us all unite!}\footnote{Credit: Charlie Chaplin, Reworked by Kevin Harrington} }