formatting

ScopeSequencing.tex

@@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ No one should be forced to go along with a decision to which they did not assent
 
 \vspace{0.2cm}
 
-The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below. 
-
+The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below.
+ 
+{\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
+	
 \textbf{1)} someone makes a proposal for a certain course of action
 
 \vspace{0.2cm}
@@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ The process follows a looping structure. That structure is describe below.
  \textbf{4.2)} asking if there are any blocks. A block is not a “no” vote. It is much more like a veto. Perhaps the best way to think of it is that it allows anyone in the group to temporarily don the robes of a Supreme Court justice and strike down a piece of legislation they consider unconstitutional; or, in this casein violation of the fundamental principles of unity or purpose of being of the group.  I should note that the usual language in Occupy Wall Street is that a block has to be based on a “moral, ethical, or safety concern that’s so strong you’d consider leaving the movement were the proposal to go forward”.
  
 \par}
-
+\par}
 
 \pagebreak
 {\centering \huge \textbf{Why Build a Common?}\par}